What Is Theta?

Samsung and Sony-backed Theta Network wants to make it cheaper for companies to share video content. Here’s how it all works.

In brief

  • Theta Network aims to provide a decentralized infrastructure for video streaming that’s cheaper than centralized alternatives.
  • Participants in the Theta Network are paid in tokens for sharing video content to other users.

Hosting and sharing video content is a tricky business.

The problem is, if the content is all stored in one place, it can be very slow for people around the world to access it. So video sharing websites will use multiple servers around the world so they can deliver the content much more quickly—known as a content delivery network (CDN).

But it’s expensive to pay for a CDN. These services will typically charge for the amount of data being used, meaning that when a video streaming site becomes popular, its costs will rise.

This is where Theta Network wants to make a difference.

What is Theta Network?

Theta Network is aimed at cutting the costs of operation for video streaming services like YouTube. It works by reducing the load on the content distribution network by putting some of it on Theta’s peer-to-peer network. It’s a little bit like BitTorrent, where people share video content with each other, but it actually pays its users for sharing this content.

Theta Network isn’t trying to replace YouTube or live streaming platform Twitch. Instead, it’s trying to provide new infrastructure for such businesses that’s not only decentralized, but far cheaper. https://www.youtube.com/embed/OQR7GVoV-24?autoplay=0&mute=0&controls=1&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fdecrypt.co&playsinline=1&showinfo=0&rel=0&iv_load_policy=3&modestbranding=1&enablejsapi=1&widgetid=1

If you’re trying to watch a video on a video streaming site that uses the Theta Network, you will receive the data in a combination of two ways. Some of the video will be streamed directly from the site’s hosting platform, but you’ll also receive some of it from local peers using the Theta Network.

While Theta Network claims to be cheaper than centralized alternatives, it still has some costs attached—and this is why the Theta tokens are needed.

How Theta Network uses two tokens

Those participating in the Theta Network get paid for sharing video content to other users. The video sites themselves pay for this service, not the end-user.

In order to pay for the data being streamed, the network uses a token called TFUEL. When someone shares the video content to someone else who’s trying to watch the video, the streaming site pays them in TFUEL tokens. It’s worth noting that these users don’t stream whole clips but just small amounts of data for each video—so the end-user will receive fragments of video data from multiple users and piece it together themselves.Theta Token Rises 17,000% in a Year, Cracks Top 10 CoinsA new token has seemingly boomed out of nowhere into the top 10 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. Theta, which is up 17,000% in the past year, is now the ninth biggest crypto with a m…NewsCoinsMathew Di SalvoMar 23, 2021

Theta Network also has a second token, called THETA. This is a governance token that’s designed to help the community manage the Theta blockchain and control its direction in the future. Currently the governance element is in its infancy, but the project plans to hand over more control to THETA holders in the future.

The THETA token has a fixed supply of 1 billion tokens with no inflation. You can stake THETA tokens to receive TFUEL, which has a supply of 5.2 billion tokens and a fixed 5% inflation rate.

What is the Theta blockchain?

The Theta blockchain is fast and designed for smaller payments. This enables it to provide real-time payments to reward content distributors for their efforts.

It achieves this through a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, which is based on the Tendermint blockchain code. This mechanism involves users locking up large amounts of THETA in a process known as staking. Then they process blocks; if they process malicious blocks, they might lose some of their staked tokens.

Theta network world nodes
Theta nodes around the world. Image: Theta Labs.

But the blockchain has two levels. First, it has validator nodes. These involve powerful computers processing a large number of transactions quickly. There are fewer of these and they are typically run by companies who are backing the network, such as Samsung and Sony. They are the first line of defense in keeping the network secure. Those running validator nodes have to stake 1 million THETA tokens.

Second, there are community nodes. These are run by thousands of community members and they check and validate that the validator nodes are performing accurately. If a malicious block was somehow accepted by all the validator nodes, these community nodes would stop it in its tracks. These nodes only need to stake 1,000 THETA tokens.

Who is backing Theta Network?

The company behind Theta Network is called Theta Labs. It’s run by CEO Mitch Liu and has its own streaming site, Theta.tv, which pays viewers in TFUEL to watch video content (since they are then sharing that content to other peers). The company has around 25 employees, mostly based in the San Francisco Bay Area—although it’s looking to expand and has recently opened an office in Seoul.

The company has a nominal amount of revenue currently, according to Wes Levitt, head of strategy at Theta Labs. While the Theta TV platform brings in some revenue, it’s nothing relative to the size of the Theta blockchain, he explained. Rather, the company has been relying on funds raised from its investors.

These investors include Samsung and the Sony Innovation Fund, along with a string of VC firms. As noted, many of these investors run validator nodes on the Theta blockchain. Four of these VC firms announced in March that they will be staking $100 million of their Theta tokens—largely acquired in earlier investments when the token was cheaper—in a collaborative validator node.

The company also has advisers from a range of mainstream media companies, including Steve Chen, co-founder of YouTube, Justin Kan, co-founder of Twitch, and Jonathan Wong, director of product at video streaming website Rakuten Viki.

Theta Labs has so far been granted three patents by the United States Patent and Trademark Office related to its video streaming service, Levitt told Decrypt. The patents relate to how the data is streaming utilizing a decentralized network.

How does Theta stop people cheating the system?

One potential issue with Theta Network is the idea that someone could just use two computers and share video through the network to themselves and get paid for doing so. However, there are a few safeguards that aim to prevent this.

For a start, the network doesn’t let someone stream content to the same IP address. This prevents the basic example above. The network also has a few other similar limitations, that can be fine-tuned by the video streaming platform, depending on how strict they want to be.

Another key element is that those sharing the video content don’t get to choose who they’re sharing to. So if they tried to game the system and share content to themselves, they would naturally be sharing content to potentially thousands of other users. As a result, they would actually be doing more good to the network than harm, according to Levitt.

What does the future hold?

In the near term, Theta Network will be upgrading to its Mainnet 2.0. This will upgrade the network and provide a few benefits.

The upgrade will provide more support for edge nodes. These are nodes that download and share video content without the user needing to watch the video. This is for people who want to support the network and earn TFUEL. Levitt estimated that a user could earn around $10-15 a month by running a node full time.

Theta Labs also plans to introduce a non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace. NFTs are unique, digital tokens that represent a piece of digital content, such as art or music. The marketplace will allow Theta TV content creators to issue their own NFTs and use them to interact with their viewing audience.

Levitt noted that most of Theta’s partners in the entertainment space are trying to find ways to enter the nascent NFT market. That is, as long as the ballooning NFT market doesn’t pop.

By Tim Copeland

What is Kyber Network

Kyber Network is a decentralized, blockchain-based protocol that aggregates liquidity and enables the exchange of tokens without an intermediary. Kyber Network can be integrated into decentralized applications (dApps), crypto wallets, and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. The protocol is governed by holders of its native Kyber Network Crystals (KNC) token through KyberDAO, a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO).

Kyber Network Defined

Kyber Network is a decentralized, blockchain-based protocol that facilitates the exchange of tokens without an intermediary and provides liquidity for decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. At the time of this writing, Kyber Network is integrated with more than 100 applications, and powers KyberSwap, Kyber Network’s decentralized exchange (DEX). Kyber Network is governed by the holders of its native KNC token through KyberDAO, a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO).

Kyber Network Provides Critical Liquidity to DeFi

Before examining Kyber Network’s design, let’s first unpack why liquidity is important to the DeFi ecosystem. In the cryptocurrency community, liquidity refers to several things: the ability to exchange an asset without substantially shifting its price in the process, the amount of trading activity in a market, and the ease with which an asset can be converted to cash. Liquidity is essential to healthy, functional, user-friendly markets, but can be difficult for new DeFi protocols to both attain and retain.

In traditional financial markets, liquidity providers are centralized entities like banks and financial institutions. However, utilizing centralized entities to provide liquidity in DeFi markets would run contrary to the ecosystem’s ethos of decentralization. As a result, permissionless protocols like Kyber Network have emerged to take their place. Kyber Network’s mission is to create a world in which any token of value can be used anywhere for swaps in any wallet, as well as for payment services, and other newly developed financial products.

How Does Kyber Network Work?

Kyber Network consists of a set of smart contracts that can be implemented on any smart contract-capable blockchain, though it is only implemented on Ethereum as of December 2020. The protocol aggregates liquidity from a variety of reserves, including token holders, market makers, and decentralized exchanges, into a single liquidity pool on its network. Anyone can provide liquidity to the network. Kyber Network enables its three primary users — decentralized applications (dApps), vendors, and crypto wallets — to execute instant token swaps without the use of a trusted third party.

Let’s run through two types of trades.

In every trade, there is the token that represents the core asset. Ether (ETH) currently acts as this token in the Ethereum implementation of the protocol, so any trade must involve an exchange of ETH for another token. Imagine that you want to trade ETH for BAT, Brave’s Basic Attention Token:

  • You send your ETH to the Kyber Network smart contract.
  • The contract then queries all of its reserves for the best ETH to BAT exchange rate.
  • The contract then sends the ETH to the reserve with the best ETH to BAT exchange rate.
  • Finally, that reserve then sends you your BAT.

Now let’s imagine that you want to trade BAT for DAI. In this example, since you are not trading directly in ETH, some additional steps are required because ETH is the core asset:

  • You send your BAT to the Kyber Network smart contract. 
  • The contract then queries all of its reserves for the best BAT to ETH exchange rate.
  • The contract then sends the BAT to the reserve with the best BAT to ETH exchange rate. 
  • That reserve then sends ETH to the contract. 
  • The contract then queries all of its reserves for the best ETH to DAI exchange rate. 
  • The contract then sends the ETH to the reserve with the best ETH to DAI exchange rate.
  • Finally, that reserve then sends you your DAI.

Despite the second trade involving more steps, both trades are completed in a single blockchain transaction. Likewise, with Kyber Network, all trades are instantly settled on the blockchain and are either executed in full or reverted. In other words, your trades should never be partially executed (though they may be partially executed on other types of exchanges). Additionally, all exchange rates offered by reserves are publicly verifiable if you query the smart contracts.

When integrated into dApps, DeFi platforms, and crypto wallets, the Kyber Network has a wide range of use cases. For example, a dApp that would like to accept users who do not hold its native token can integrate the Kyber protocol to allow for in-app token swap and token conversion functionalities. These features enable the dApp’s users to utilize any Kyber Network-supported token and simultaneously enable the dApp to receive payment in the token of its choice.

KyberDAO and KNC

Holders of KNC can participate in the governance of Kyber Network through KyberDAO. By staking their tokens, KNC holders can vote on the network’s fee model, rebates for reserves, and other proposals, and also earn staking rewards denominated in ether. KNC is a deflationary staking token, which means its supply will decrease over time. KNC is only an ERC-20 token as of December 2020, but Kyber Network anticipates that it will also be implemented on other blockchains in the future. Nonetheless, its supply will be managed as if it were a single token, and Kyber Network is developing technologies that will enable the transfer of KNC across blockchains.

Kyber Network’s broadly integrated protocol offers an on-chain, decentralized solution to DeFi’s liquidity challenges and provides ERC-20 tokens with ecosystem-wide utility.

By Cryptopedia

What is iExec RLC

Decentralized cloud computing sounds like a beautiful combination of buzzwords used to hype up a product, doesn’t it?  Don’t worry, iExec has substance to back up the buzz, and if this is the first time you’ve heard about the project, that makes sense–the team isn’t big on hype.

As this guide’s title spells out, iExec is a platform for decentralized cloud computing, so think IBM or Microsoft cloud services but broken up into multiple nodes for off-chain computing of blockchain applications.  It’s a similar concept to Golem (supercomputing) and Siacoin (cloud storage), except it’s using cloud services for processing power. Its target audience is the blockchain realm itself and its budding ecosystem of DApps.

The State of Cloud Computing

Before we break down how iExec functions, it’d be useful to look at centralized cloud computing as it stands today.  Cloud computing has quickly become an industry standard for companies that want access to processing power without having to maintain expensive technological infrastructure.  Companies like Netflix, Apple, Etsy, and Xerox, for instance, manage some (or all) of their applications and data with cloud computing from companies like Amazon, Google, IBM, or Microsoft.  The reason is simple: if these companies already have tens of thousands of servers to support data-intensive computations, why not outsource their processing power?  Simply put, these services give businesses access to otherwise expensive resources.

iExec wants to provide the same service, but they want to decentralize it.  The market for this industry was $22.4bln in 2016, and it’s projected to reach $55bln by 2026.  More or less, the big players have cemented themselves as reliable providers, so why would iExec try to disrupt an industry that seems set-in-stone?

The simple answer being, they’re not trying to.  Instead, they want to be for decentralized applications what popular cloud computing services are for legacy businesses: the one-stop resource for blockchain cloud computing.

You might be asking, why does blockchain need this?  Glad you asked.  There’s a brilliant article on the subject by Noam Levenson and Alex Price for Hackernoon on the subject.  Basically, if any of the smart contracts built on Ethereum (or any DApp platform) want to function properly in real-world use, they’ll need access to more computing than the Ethereum virtual machine provides. Ethereum’s virtual machine houses and executes smart contracts on the network’s nodes and mining programs.  

As DApps and smart contracts see adoption and widespread use, running all these computations through Ethereum’s blockchain would create a latency/scalability disaster of such magnitude that would render the network useless–just look at what a few million dollars worth of CryptoKitties did to Ethereum in a matter of days.

Essentially, iExec wants to create a network of computing resources that will allow the Ethereum ecosystem to scale to its potential in the future.

How Does iExec RLC Work?

In order to support DApps, smart contracts, and their platforms, iExec takes processing-intensive computations off-chain so as to keep a blockchain’s on-chain functions running smoothly.

To do this, iExec makes use of XtremWeb-HEP, an open-sourced Desktop Grid Software.  Desktop Grid computing (also known as Volunteer Computing) pools unused computing resources to be used by applications and platforms, and according to iExec’s whitepaper, XtremWeb-HEP “implements all the needed features” to make this possible on a global scale, including “fault-tolerance, multi-applications, multi-users, hybrid public/private infrastructure, deployment of virtual images, data management, security and accountability, and many more.”

Essentially, with this software, DApps can utilize any computing resource in the iExec framework to run their programs.  This means that developers and DApp users can commission processing power from a resource as small as a PC’s CPU to as large as a warehouse-sized data center.  Options will be flexible, scalable, and free-market driven, allowing users to find just the right amount of computing power for the task at hand.

iExec infographic

iExec accomplishes this service matching using its smart contracts.  The Matchmaking algorithm, for example, takes resource requests on the network and matches them with an appropriate provider.  This smart contract basically looks at a DApp’s task and asks, “Can this computing resource run this program?”  If yes, then it’s a match made in heaven.  If not, then it’s time to move on (nothing personal).In order to ensure that users are getting the resources they need, iExec uses a Proof of Contribution model.  This consensus algorithm makes sure that a provider provisions the computational power needed by the user, and it rewards this provider with RLC, iExec’s token, in return for these services.

iExec’s Platform Components

Taking a step outside of the software and technicals, let’s take a look at the pieces that make up iExec’s platform.  These include its marketplace, DApp store, and data marketplace.

Marketplace: The marketplace is iExec’s hub for providers and users to exchange RLC for computer resources.  Through the marketplace, individuals/developers running DApps can shop for the resources tailored towards their application’s needs.  iExec comes with a Matchmaking smart contract that ensures that no provider is biting off more than it can chew when committing its processing power to a contract.  Moreover, a reputation smart contract manages a provider’s reliability.

Think of this like a Yelp review for computing resources.  This reputation system allows users to choose the level of reliability they want, paying less for a less reliable host if they so desire.  Thus, the marketplace is free-market driven, and the more providers and users on it, the more competition will dictate pricing.

DApp Store: Finally, a decentralized equivalent to application stores.  As its name suggests, the DApp store allows you to browse and purchase DApps that are built on or use iExec.  And the cool thing is, the DApp store is live and already features applications you can purchase today.  Additionally, application providers can also submit their DApps for listing on the platform.

iExec dApp Store

Data Marketplace: This marketplace is to data what the DApp store is to applications.  With it, data providers can sell their excess data to DApp providers or any other party willing to purchase it.  Ranging from athlete stats to government consensus data, the sky’s the limit to what you could market on this platform.  If someone is willing to buy it, you can use iExec to sell it. Unlike the DApp store (up and running) and Marketplace (set to release this year), the Data Marketplace is still in the conceptual stages of its development, so don’t expect it for some time yet.

iExec Team and What’s to Come

iExec’s core team consists of six PhDs, four of which have been working in cloud computing since the early 2000s.

These four, Gilles Fedak, Haiwu He, Oleg Lodygensky, and Mircea Moca, have experience working at INRIA and CNRS developing programs for Desktop Grid computing.  iExec is the product of their collective experience, and after Gilles Fedak discovered Ethereum in 2016, the team found the solution to a problem they had been debating since 2012: how to create a distributed cloud based on Desktop Grid computing.

Thus, iExec was born, and the team has been making steady progress towards realizing their goal since. They maintain an active GitHub, updating it consistently with the open-sourced fruits of their labor, including iExec’s software development kit in November of 2017.

iExec team

Most all of iExec’s v1 “Essential Edition” of its roadmap has been accomplished.  Up next is the v2 “Market Network,” which will look to expand on the DApp store and launch the network’s Marketplace.

When this Marketplace is launched, iExec will also undergo a decentralization process, as all data/computing centers are currently under the control of iExec’s team for reasons of convenience.  

The team will tackle V3-v5 in time, but most of these developments will come in the far future.

iExec’s Competition

In their whitepaper, the iExec team lays out the project’s competitive landscape and explains these competitors in relation to iExec.

They’re quick to note that decentralized cloud storage providers like Filecoin, Storj, and Siacoin are not direct competitors, and it’s easy to see why.  While iExec could theoretically take a step in this direction as it matures, it’s not a storage platform; it’s a computing platform.

This does put it in competition with other decentralized computing protocols like Golem and SOMN. Both of these, however, are taking aim at a different animal.  Essentially, they’re both building a decentralized supercomputer on blockchain technology, while iExec is targeting DApp development and sustainability.  Both look towards a future of a blockchain-powered, decentralized internet, but their functions, while sometimes similar, are more complementary than conflicting.

iExec Trading History

iExec had a brief stint in the market cap top 100 before the crash, only to settle back down below this threshold during the bloodbath.

Where to Buy iExec RLC

Bittrex, Binance, Upbit, and Bitfinex account for the majority of RLC’s trading volume.  Each exchange sports BTC and ETH trading pairs, while you can also buy it directly with USD on Bitfinex.

Where to Store iExec RLC

RLC is an ERC20 token, so an Ethereum compatible wallet will have you covered for storage, including MyEtherWallet, Nano Ledger S, Meta Mask, Exodus, Laxx, and imToken.

Final Thoughts

If iExec functions as intended, it could scale exponentially as more providers and computing resources join the network.  This could open the door for scalability solutions, sustainable DApp support, and future blockchain adoption.  It also provides a greener alternative to current cloud computing models, as resources are only used when they’re needed and in a less energy-intensive manner.

The project is certainly ambitious, but for what it’s worth, the iExec team has worked on successful projects before in the same vein.  They helped to develop the European Desktop Grid Infrastructure, a series of 200,000 nodes that executed more than a million tasks using Desktop Grid computing.  This project laid the foundation for iExec, while also demonstrating its feasibility.

iExec team experience

We don’t know whether or not iExec will live up to its expectations, but we sure do have confidence that its team isn’t piddling around with this project.  They have the experience, the brainpower, and the determination to see this project through, and for the future of blockchain, we hope they do.  DApps and other platforms will need something like iExec if they want to survive in the working market, so here’s to hoping the best for the project moving forward.

By Colin Harper

What is Synthetix Network Token?

In brief

  • Synthetix is a token trading platform built on Ethereum.
  • It allows to creation of real world assets, like stocks and shares to be bought and traded using crypto.
  • Synthetix started out as a stablecoin, before pivoting to DeFi.

The trading of stocks, currencies, commodities, and other assets are still dominated by the likes of Wall Street, London, Hong Kong, and other traditional financial centers. Synthetix wants to bring that toolkit over into the decentralized, global, permission-less, and 24/7 world of crypto. 

Read on to discover how a crucial pivot in tokenomics turned Synthetix into one of the hottest DeFi

products available.

What is Synthetix?

Synthetix allows users to bet on crypto assets, stocks, currencies, precious metals, and other assets in the form of ERC20 tokens. Synthetic assets or “Synths” copy the price of an asset in the “real world” and brings it onto the Ethereum blockchain giving that Synth all the properties of an ERC20 token. 

Holding a Synth is not the same as holding an asset. For example, a synthetic MKR token is the same price as a “real” MKR token, but without the voting rights an actual MKR token holder would have. This system allows users to bet on the price of an asset without holding the actual asset. 

Who Invented Synthetix?

Synthetix started as a stablecoin project called Havven and was founded by Kain Warwick, the current CEO. Synthetix is now one of the biggest projects in DeFi with over $180 million worth of SNX tokens locked up in the protocol in December 2019. 

Did you know?

The protocol has a very famous holder of SNX tokens – a16z crypto – the venture fund who bought 6% of the total MakerDAO token supply in September 2018. However, a16z never announced an investment in SNX or even mentioned it. There simply sits 374,111 SNX tokens in the a16z address without any explanation. 

What’s so special about it?

Synthetix uses a multi-token infrastructure based on a system of collateral, staking, inflation, and fees. The system uses two types of tokens–the main Synthetix Network Token (SNX) and synthetic assets or Synths. The system is similar to MakerDAO’s where ETH is locked up to create DAI. In Synthetix, SNX is locked up to create sUSD (synthetic USD). The sUSD acts as debt while SNX acts as the collateral. The main difference between Synthetix and MakerDAO is SNX is staked as collateral to potentially create any synthetic asset–not just sUSD. 

One of the core requirements of the Synthetix system is the ability to get accurate information from the “outside world” such as the price of the Japanese Yen – and eventually the price of stocks like Tesla. To get this price information, Synthetix was previously using centralized price feeds or oracles, which were vulnerable to manipulation and exploitation. Now they have partnered with ChainLink and their decentralized oracle system to reliably bring information to the blockchain without needing to trust a central party – very DeFi. Bid at the Decrypt x Reuters NFT Auction Decrypt is holding an NFT auction with Reuters to shine a light on the important work of crisis photographers. They work tirelessly to document humanity. The proceeds go directly to the freelance photographers to fund their projects. Bid now.AdPartnerTogether with Decrypt

What else is different? 

Much of Synthetix’ recent success can be attributed to its innovative token incentive model. SNX holders stake SNX in return for fees from the Synthetix exchange and rewards from the system’s inflationary monetary policy. To create a new Synth, more than 750% of the value of the Synth must be staked as SNX. The more SNX staked and locked as collateral, the less is available in the market and the more valuable the token becomes. The proof is in the price. The SNX token made a dramatic rise from $0.03 at the start of the year to over $1.30 at the end of 2019.

How are SNX tokens produced? 

Back when Synthetix was Havven, it launched an ICO

and raised $30 million with a total supply of 100 million Havven tokens. In February 2019, Synthetix changed its monetary policy and there are now over 164 million SNX tokens, which will increase to 250 million over the next 5 years. The growing supply of SNX tokens was meant to reward and incentivize SNX stakers. 

How do you get hold of SNX tokens?

If you have an Ethereum wallet and some crypto already, you can trade SNX tokens on decentralized

exchanges like Kyber and Uniswap. You can also stake SNX to create new Synths using their Mintr dapp.

What can you do with Synthetix?

The Synthetix platform was primarily created for users to trade Synths. Holders of Synths can go long on an asset – bet the price will increase. Or they can short an asset – bet the price will decrease. 

By staking SNX, holders can create new Synths, collect rewards, and watch their holdings grow. It could be why over 85% of the total SNX supply is currently locked up in the protocol.

The Future

Synthetix spent much of 2019 rising to the top of the DeFi dapp charts before ending the year with a commitment to transition to a decentralized governance structure. They began 2020 by demonstrating the “money lego” properties of DeFi by integrating their sUSD stablecoin with the margin trading platform bZx. But the big feature most have been waiting for is the ability to trade stocks like Tesla and Apple on top of Ethereum – an absolute game-changer for DeFi believers everywhere.

By Matt Hussey and Ki Chong Tran

Complete Guide to Decentralized Exchange (DEX)

Cryptocurrencies and decentralized technologies are booming. The numbers speak for themselves — market capitalizations have gone through the roof, transaction volume has skyrocketed, and adoption from individuals, corporations, and governments has reached a global scale.

Thanks to blockchain technology, we are moving toward a trustless economy, with no need of third parties to exchange goods. Yet today’s digital currency exchanges are centralized. They have proven to be vulnerable to hacks, to react poorly to unusual blockchain events like hard forks, and often run with a high regulatory risk. Centralized exchanges keep their systems off-chain, meaning they operate as escrows for their clients, and transactions are not recorded on the blockchain. This leads to massive breaches of security and unsafe storage of information, funds, and private keys.

Trading comes with risks, but traders should not face any other risks than those they are already willing to take.

Blockchain entrepreneurs understand this, and some of them are working hard on what many believe will be the future of trading: decentralized exchanges.

Decentralized exchanges — or DEXes — aim to tackle the problems that impede centralized structures by building peer-to-peer marketplaces directly on the blockchain — Ethereum mostly — allowing traders to remain custodian of their funds. However, building a fully decentralized and efficient exchange remains today something of an utopia. Exchanges are centralized because it is the simplest way to proceed, and it is either too costly or technically complex to build fully decentralized platforms — for now, at least.

Throwbacks and inefficiencies of centralized exchanges leave the model with only few advantages. Many semi-decentralized exchanges are coming into action. They are hybrid models between centralized and decentralized marketplaces, trying to deliver the best of both worlds. There is an increasing number of such exchanges, following up on a need expressed by the crypto-community.

This “state of decentralized exchanges” begins with major cryptocurrency numbers and centralized exchanges, which currently monopolize the market. Decentralized exchanges are building the future of cryptocurrencies trading, and this “state” aims to pave its way with its rough listing of projects in the making. We should pay attention to them as they are shaping the way cryptocurrencies trading will operate in the future.

Disclaimer: I am part of VariabL (a derivatives trading platform on Ethereum) and ConsenSys (one of the largest global blockchain specialists).

I. Cryptocurrency Market Overview and the Flaws of Centralized Exchanges
2017 Cryptocurrency market in numbers¹ :

+3400%*=Market cap of cryptocurrencies is experiencing an exponential growth:

From less than $18B to more than $600B in 2017.

Crypto market cap comparison & growth stats.

More than 99% of cryptocurrency transactions go through centralized exchanges.

II. Centralized Exchanges

Let’s first define what centralized exchanges are: platforms and apps that enable traders to buy, sell, and exchange cryptocurrencies against fiat currencies or other cryptocurrencies. They are marketplaces for tokens, and are essential to the ecosystem, since many of them enable payments with fiat currencies , i.e. non-crypto holders are able to buy crypto using USD, EUR, etc.

Among most well-known and trafficked centralized exchanges are Bithumb, Bitfinex, Bittrex, Poloniex, Kraken, GDAX, Coinbase and Gemini. Hundreds already exist, but the goal here is not to focus on their number, but rather on their limitations and potential for improvement.

Centralized crypto-exchanges may soon become obsolete as they lose the opportunity to leverage blockchain technology to improve their capabilities and efficiency.

  • Insecurity, risk of fund loss and thefts due to their centralized functioning. They are legally accountable and a custodian of users’ funds. 73% of centralized exchanges take custody of user funds, while 23% let users control keys⁴. They represent honeypots for hackers as they are responsible for billions of trades per day and store most of them on their servers.
  • A lack of liquidity: large orders struggle to be matched. Even at an all-time-high, volumes remain low (compared to traditional markets).
  • A fragmented (not to say decentralized) market: divides the global liquidity into a few main marketplaces. No clear market leader in terms of volume, which increases the liquidity problem.
Ether Exchange Trading Volume in USD - Source: “State of Blockchain — Q3 2017"by Coindesk
Source: “State of Blockchain — Q3 2017″ by Coindesk
  • A high level of risks for users due to potential performance issues, market manipulation, hardware failures, latency problems, and many other inherent problems when it comes to dealing with large volumes…
  • A lack of trust and transparency: actual costs and processes of trading are opaque and involve high trading costs, often higher than announced fees and higher delays due to peaks of demand badly managed. Plus, they can front-run orders, which is illegal.
  • A lack of educated users: markets are flooded by pure speculators unaware of safe ways to deal with cryptocurrencies.
III. Decentralized Exchanges and Open Protocols

Due to the lack of security, transparency, and efficiency that centralized exchanges have demonstrated, a strong demand for decentralized exchanges have surfaced. Scores of new actors are tackling these problems and addressing an obvious need by the community. Projects like 0x, Ethfinex, ShapeShift.io (not decentralized but not custodian) and EtherDelta have emerged and generated a strong interest.

Decentralized exchanges promises two major benefits: Security & control and global marketplace by Michael Oved (founder of AirSwap Team, a ConsenSys Spoke)

One of the oldest projects in the field is EtherDelta, a platform with a simple user-interface and basic trading features (no margin trading), which has already gained sufficient traction to generate up to 25 million USD-equivalent of daily transactions⁵.

Definition

Decentralized exchanges differ from centralized exchanges as they enable users to remain in control of their funds by operating their critical functions on the blockchain: they leverage the technology behind cryptocurrencies themselves to enable a safer and more transparent trading. It solves the main limitations faced by cryptocurrency markets (see above), since there is no single point of failure, aligning them with what has made the blockchain technology so powerful in the first place.

Most decentralized exchanges are not fully decentralized, but semi-decentralized (full decentralization is today more of an ideal, due to limitations listed hereunder). In most cases, servers (centralized) still host order books (among other features) but do not hold private keys.

Another central aspect is that decentralized exchanges present the characteristics, benefits and limitations, of their underlying blockchain.

Main DEX Benefits
  • Trustless, which means that users’ funds and personal data are safe.
  • Security and privacy are well preserved.
Main DEX Limitations
  • Maintain the same scalability problems as the underlying blockchain.
  • Most are not easily usable, struggle with liquidity, do not provide fiat payments etc.

(more details in a section below)

Decentralized Exchange Mapping
Disclaimers:

This “state of decentralized exchanges” may not be fully exhaustive and did not assess all of those projects’ viability nor teams’ legitimacy. However, an effort has been made towards making an exhaustive mapping. Abandoned or scammy projects might be included. It should be taken with a grain of salt and you should conduct your own due diligence before using or investing in any of those.

  • All the projects below are or contain decentralized exchanges functionalities in their global offers. Many are not limited to exchange services. For the sake of that study, and since there are not (m)any fully decentralized and working exchanges, semi-decentralized exchange will be included.
  • Some exchanges offering advanced financial products such as futures or derivatives like dYdX or VariabL are voluntarily excluded of this benchmark since there is another article in the making for these ones.
  • The vast majority is in production/beta; this report aims to list all of them and assess their current state of development. I included their website and Medium accounts when available, which provide most of projects’ updates.

AirSwap (Airswap blog)

P2P decentralized exchange on Ethereum using the Swap protocol

Altcoin.io (Altcoin.io Exchange)

Decentralized cryptocurrency exchange, powered by Atomic Swaps (Beta on testnet)

Barterdex (by Komodo Platform)

Open source decentralized network doing atomic swaps (in production)

Bancor Protocol (Bancor)

Smart contract based token exchange protocol (Live on the Ethereum MainNet)

Bisq (ex Bitsquare)

Crypto-fiat open-source exchange with a desktop application working via Tor to trade Bitcoins (Live)

Blocknet (TheBlocknet)

Decentralized exchange enabling cryptocurrencies trading and fiat currency gateways through cross-chain atomic swaps and cross-chain data transfers (In production)

Coinffeine:

Decentralized Bitcoin exchange with a “Zero Trust” exchange algorithm (Down)

Catalyst (by Enigma Project)

Investment platform for algorithmic/data-driven trading on crypto-assets without a custodian (in alpha; simulation available)

Etherdelta

The cryptocurrencies fully decentralized exchange market leader for ERC-20 tokens (Live)

Etherex

Open-source decentralized exchange built on Ethereum (last update on April 2016)

Forkdelta

Community-driven open source and forked version of Etherdelta, uses the same orderbook and contract (Live on the Ethereum MainNet)

Gnosis Dutch Exchange (by Gnosis)

Decentralized exchange for ERC-20 tokens based on the Dutch auction principle (in production)

Heat

Real-time asset-to-asset decentralized exchange (MainNet)

Herdius (Herdius blog)

Decentralized exchange focused on scalability and cross-chain interoperability (ICO expected in Q1’2018)

Hodl Hodl (Hodl Hodl)

P2P cryptocurrency exchange on the Bitcoin Testnet (Testnet)

IDEX (by Aurora DAO)

Decentralized exchange that provides instant order placement and execution, free order cancellation, and real-time order book updates. (Live on the Ethereum MainNet)

KyberNetwork (by Loi Luu)

Decentralized exchange and conversion of digital assets, api for payments and derivatives (Demo on Ropsten)

Legolas (Legolas blog)

Hybrid centralized/decentralized exchange targeting market makers (In production, ICO Q1’2018)

Loopring (by Daniel Wang)

Decentralized Exchange for ERC20 and Open Protocol to serve multiple public blockchains (in production)

Lykke

Semi-decentralized exchange for cryptocurrencies and fiats (live, with a centralized model. Will switch to decentralized model in the future)

Mothership (Mothership blog)

Decentralized exchange (in production, ICO raised)

NEX

Decentralized exchange on NEO with an off-chain matching engine including payment services. (in production, trading platform launch expected in Q3’2018)

Next.exchange

Decentralized exchange focused on ICOs with Crypto-pools and community trading (in production, launch expected in January 2018)

Nvo.io

Cross-platform modular / decentralized exchange using the Safenetwork for orders validation (in production, launch expected Q1’2018)

Oasis DEX (by Makerdao)

Decentralized Token Market — on-chain market for all token assets in the Maker registry (live on MainNet)

OmegaOne (Omega One)

Decentralized trade execution platform (a Consensys spoke, in production)

OpenANX

Open sourced and governed decentralized exchange (In production)

Raidex

Decentralized exchange with Raiden off-chain state channel technology (in production)

SingularX (by SingularDTV)

Decentralized peer reviewed trading platform for tokenized intellectual property and ERC-20 tokens (Live Beta)

Stellar Distributed Exchange (by Stellar)

StellarTerm is an open source distributed exchange for the Stellar network. (Live since 2015)

Streamity (Streamity)

Semi-decentralized cryptocurrency exchange with fiat onramps (In production, ICO Q1’2018)

Token Store

Ethereum token exchange built on smart contracts in a semi-decentralized way (Live on the Ethereum MainNet)

Waves (Wavesplatform)

Crypto-platform for asset/custom token issuance, transfer and trading on the Waves blockchain, with centralised order matching and decentralised settlement. (Live since June 2016)

Xchainge (xChainge🙂

Decentralized exchanges of crypto-assets (by Counterparty, Open source platform on the Bitcoin blockchain)

Graphene/Bitshares Decentralized Exchanges:

Graphene is an Open Protocol, see more information below.

Bitshares

Decentralized exchange providing price stable cryptocurrencies and banking services on the blockchain (Live since 2014) [Probably the oldest decentralized exchange sill working]

Blocktrades

Decentralized exchange acting as counterparty (Live)

BTSABC

Decentralized exchange powered by Bitshares and Graphene technology -in Chinese (Beta)

CryptoBridge (CryptoBridge)

Decentralized cryptocurrency exchange with multi-signature federated gateway network (Live Beta)

Cybex (Cybex Decentralized Exchange)

Decentralized exchange system based on the Graphene/EOS Blockchains (Beta)

DEEX Exchange (Deex Ex)

Decentralized exchange with blockchain traded funds and many (Private Beta)

GDEX

Offers a stack of decentralized financial services including exchange and banking on a blockchain (Live)

OpenLedger (OpenLedger)

Decentralized exchange powered by Bitshares and Graphene technology (Demo)

RuDEX

Decentralized exchange powered by Bitshares and Graphene technology — in Russian (Beta)

0x Relayers (0x)

0x is an Open Protocol, see definition below and read https://relayer.network for a great explanation of relayers.

Amadeus

Relayers for dApps looking for liquidity to exchange ERC20 tokens (in production)

DDEX (DDEX)

User-Friendly decentralized exchange for ERC20 tokens (on MainNet)

Decent Ex (DecentEx)

Decentralized exchange for Ethereum tokens (on Kovan TestNet)

Dextroid

Low cost trading and user-friendly exchange on the blockchain. (on Kovan TestNet)

ERC dEX (ERC dEX blog)

Decentralized Exchange with advanced financial tools, available on mobile (Beta on the Ethereum MainNet)

Ethfinex

Community-driven, decentralized trading platform for ERC20 Tokens (live)

IDT Exchange (ex Kin Alpha)

ERC20 decentralized exchange (first relayer to go on the MainNet)

Paradex (Paradex)

Exchange ERC20 tokens with a centralized matching strategy (beta on the MainNet)

RadarRelay (Radar Relay)

0x order book to find and trade any ERC20 token. (live on the MainNet)

The Ocean X (The Ocean X)

0x relayer and liquidity pool for trading Ethereum-based token (Beta)

IV. Open Protocols for Decentralized Exchanges
Definition

Open Protocols are setting up and running decentralized applications (dApps) on a common basis: some are designed especially for decentralized exchanges (ie. 0x), others also seem suited (ie. Omise). Both will be mentioned below.

They create synergies by allowing “anyone” to build their own services on top of them: it fosters innovation and is essential for native dApps to interact with each other. For decentralized exchanges, open protocols present the benefits of creating common pools of liquidity by allowing any project built on top to interact with each others.

0x (0x)

Open protocol for decentralized exchange on the Ethereum blockchain (live with dozens of relayers, dApps on open protocols/projects built)

OpenRelay

Open source relay for the 0x protocol

Lendroid

Open Protocol for Decentralized Lending that Enables Margin Trading and Short Selling of ERC20 Tokens

Enigma Protocol (Enigma Project)

Decentralized exchange protocol supporting cross-chain atomic swaps, providing an open infrastructure and trading tools

Graphene (by Bitshares)

A software platform for deploying decentralized ledgers. Not specifically developed for decentralized exchanges.

OmiseGo (by Omise)

Digital Wallets, P2P exchange & Payments (fiats & cryptos) protocol.

Snowglobe (by Alex Wearn, IDEX & Aurora DAO)

Fully-decentralized exchange protocol; designed for high-performance, EVM-compatible, decentralized child-chain exchanges

Swap Protocol (by AirSwap Team)

Peer-to-peer protocol for trading Ethereum tokens, without orderbooks (to be open in the future)

V. What May Slow Down the Adoption of Decentralized Exchanges?

Security benefits, by allowing users to remain custodian of their funds, seem obvious and emphasized by all these hacks stories. So why everyone is not using them?

Some aspects are slowing down their adoption: Education and Technology.

Education

Users are not aware of:

  • Drawbacks and security issues of Centralized Exchanges
  • Security measures to undertake (how to manage private keys etc.) since it is users’ responsibility
  • Existence of Decentralized Exchanges
  • Advantages of Decentralized Exchanges
Technology
  • Usability: DEX are not user-friendly enough (very solvable problem, linked to early stages of projects)
  • Scalability: Possible blockchain bloat with ethereum network congestion and scaling pressure (with Token sales and a slow gas price adaptation…)
  • Speed: Transactions take time to be validated on blockchains
  • Cost: There is a potential high costs per trade
  • Liquidity: Chicken and the egg problem. Traders do not join because traders are not already on the platform to match their orders; getting liquidity through a large adoption by the ecosystem is a long process.
  • Full decentralization: Some services have to remain off-chain and have to suffer from limitations of centralized infrastructures (ie. onchain orderbook are expensive not efficient enough)
  • Front-running risk: miners can preview transactions, since they validate them, and can have consequences on any DEX (market manipulation)
  • Interoperability: need for cross-chain exchanges, and more blockchains/dapps interoperability for decentralized platforms to interact with each others.
  • Accessibility: Need for fiat integrations and stable tokens for lower volatility.

On the matter, Kyber’s chief executive and co-founder, Loi Luu stated:

“…centralized exchanges are potentially unable to handle large volumes of users, touting decentralized trading platforms as a better alternative. However, decentralized exchanges are not as user-friendly as centralized options, and may not have the funds to support mass trading due to small numbers of users.”6

Conclusion

99% of cryptocurrency transactions still go through centralized exchanges; this trend is expected to be reversed in the coming years. Switching to decentralized exchanges is necessary for cryptocurrency users to exploit their full potential, aligning with the decentralized nature of blockchain itself. Education is arriving, and most technological hurdles we face today will probably be overcome very soon.

Differences between projects’ value propositions are hard to spot in this field, and most of them will probably not exist in a close future. However, the trend towards decentralized exchanges is clearly evident.

Centralized exchanges will shift toward decentralized technologies sooner rather than later, but improvements have to come from both sides. Users to learn how to protect themselves, and platforms must provide better security tools, as well as education around common issues and best practices.

“Ultimately, I believe that centralized and decentralized exchanges will co-exist as they each provide their own unique benefits,” says Linda Xie, who sums up the situation pretty well (talking about 0x). Will Warren (0x Co-Founder) goes even one step further by stating that “centralized exchanges will continue to play a critical role in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, because they offer fiat on/off-ramps.” This is one function that fully decentralized exchanges, by definition, do not allow.

If some factors are slowing down adoption, the above-mentioned open protocols (for decentralized exchanges) are fostering development by lowering entry barriers to their implementation and adoption. 0x is probably among the best projects working on the matter. However, even the 0x protocol may suffer from problems like efficiency and scalability, which still represent massive hurdles for the whole blockchain, Ethereum and exchange ecosystem. Solutions in the making, such as State Channels, or Sharding/Plasma, will allow scaling, albeit with certain sacrifices.

From a wider perspective, decentralized exchange adoption will follow the adoption of the (Ethereum) blockchain itself, alongside better educated users and technological breakthroughs. As mentioned, centralized/decentralized hybrid models will most likely get their break first. Fully decentralized exchanges remain an ideal, towards which most of those projects are aiming.

Some questions remain: does everyone want to take care of their own private keys? Probably not, but they should at least have the choice. Friction for new users switching from centralized exchanges to decentralized ones also remain a big hurdle; even the process of switching represents a considerable effort for most users…

vinny tweet

Is the switch is going to happen any time soon? People like Vinny Lingham(Civic) say that some centralized exchanges will soon close, and think this will accelerate the adoption of decentralized exchanges.

If the causes and triggers are matters of debate, we can hardly argue that decentralized exchanges are and will continue to grow as a hot topic of 2018 and potentially an essential pillar of the blockchain ecosystem.

Footnotes:

  • https://coinmarketcap.com
  • https://localethereum.com/ belongs to another type of cryptocurrencies marketplaces not mentioned here but also trending: local P2P token market places. Other examples: https://localbitcoins.com/fr/ or Dether
  • https://blog.localethereum.com/centralised-exchanges-are-terrible-at-holding-your-money/. More hack stories hacks stories: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=576337
  • “GLOBAL CRYPTOCURRENCY BENCHMARKING STUDY” Dr Garrick Hileman & Michel Rauchs (2017)
  • https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/etherdelta/
  • Loi Luu (Kyber Network): https://www.coindesk.com/uc-berkeley-kybernetwork-partner-for-decentralized-exchange-research/

By Nathan Sexer

各大去中心化交易所的比较

由于中心化交易所的诸多弊端,如:交易所跑路、倒闭现象频现,操纵市场、割用户韭菜现象普遍 ,被黑客攻击、监守自盗等事件层出不穷,屡屡致投资者血本无归且无法追查,中心化交易所的劣行已成为区块链及数字货币发展的致命瓶颈。

去中心化交易所将成为数字货币发展的必然趋势已经成为大众共识,在这一大背景下,去中心化交易所成为行业热点是区块链技术发展的必然阶段。

但去中心化交易所开发面临巨大的技术挑战,其难度是区块链技术发展之最。

考察去中心化交易所成功与否,要虑这些要素:性能跨链能力去中心化程度用户体验功能完善度。这些都是硬指标,比较容易衡量。

一、 性能

目前市面上主要的去中心化交易所,包括0X, Bancor, BinanceDEX, EtherDelta, Exchangily, iDex等。

其中0X,Etherdelta, iDex等情能较差,一般撮合需要几十秒甚至几分钟或几十分钟时间,而Bancor, BinanceDex, Exchangily性能较好,其中Exchangily性能最好,基本上达到实时交易处理,性能表面优异。

二、 跨链能力

跨链能力是衡量去中心化交易所的关键指标,0X, EtherDelta, iDex完全是基于以太坊网开发的,只能交易ERC-20代币,实质上不具有真正的跨链功能;BinanceDex是完全基于自有区块链开发的,只能交易在自已链上发行的币,也不具备真正的跨链能力;

Bancor协议兼容于以太坊及EoS两个网络,算是具备了初步的跨链能力;

只有Exchangily具备真正的跨链能力,Exchangily目前支持的网络包括比特币(Bitcoin)、以太坊(Ethereum)、莱特币(Litecoin)、发链(FAB)、比特币现金(Bitcoin Cash)、狗狗币(Dogecoin)等多条主链及这些主链上发行的所有代币,基本上支持了现有的所有主流数字货币,因而其跨链能力无可争议地最强大,是地道的去中心化交易所。

三、 去中心化程度

去中心化程度是衡量去中心化交易所安全可信任指标的关键因素,目前大多数所谓的去中心化交易所事实上是部份去中心化或多中心化,并非真正的去中心化。如Bancor基于EoS的21个节点系统、BinanceDex基于自有网络的11个节点系统,虽然提高了性能,但都不能算是真正的去中心化交易所。

0X, EtherDelta, iDex是基于公有链以太坊网络的,Exchangily是基于公有链FAB网络的,因而可以称为真正的完全去中心化交易所,具有最高的安全可信任等级。

四、 用户体验

用户体验是产品成功与否的重要因素。受制于区块链本身及底层区块链技术限制,用户体验成为去中心化交易所的鸡肋。像0X, EtherDelta, iDex等受制于以太坊的性能,效率低下,用户体验极差,很难被用户接受;

Bancor及BinanceDex目前用户体验算是不错,但也远不够理想。

Exchangily是目前市面上唯一具有类似中心化交易所用户体验的去中心化交易所。

五、 功能完善度

由于去中心化交易所一切数据均在区块链上,并无本地数据库,很多功能如交易历史、订单管理等很难实施,在功能完善度上普遍不佳。

目前仅Exchangily基本具备交易所的全部功能。

其他去中心化交易所:

1.Uniswap

Uniswap 是目前最大的去中心化交易所,日交易规模超过4亿美元。Uniswap交易手续费收入全部分配给流动性提供者,项目开发者分文不取,从这点来看,Uniswap 去中心化程度非常高,去中心化交易所龙头名副其实。

2020年10月,面对 SushiSwap 的步步紧逼,Uniswap 开启了世纪超级大空投,人均分得价值约1000美元的 UNI 代币奖励,成为业内佳话。

Uniswap上币简单,许多热门币早期均是在 Uniswap中交易的。Uniswap的优点是币种数量全,交易深度好,滑点低。

Uniswap的交易手续费为0.3%,全部分配给流动性提供者,目前 UNI 挖矿已经暂停。

Uniswap开创了自动做市商的先河,为Uniswap的交易对提供流动性,需要提供两种等值的代币。例如价值1000美元的ETH和价值1000美元的USDT构成一个交易对。

2.1inch

要说未来Uniswap最大的挑战者,币小宝认为有可能是 1inch。

1inch 有点另类,这是一家聚合交易所。简单来说,就是将其他交易所的交易对聚合到一起,用户交易时,聚合器的算法会发现最佳交易路径,并把交易拆分在多个不同交易所完成。结果是,1inch能够始终为用户执行最佳交易,同时让交易滑点变得最低。

币小宝这里以ETH/USDT为例,进行对比。 在3个交易所中,1 ETH在1inch可以换成561.3USDT,而其他两个交易所分别为558.2和557.7,因此,1inch的交易滑点更低,交易时建议多多对比,可以省去不少费用。

Uniswap与其他交易所不同,1inch目前尚未发行自己的代币,不过距离日期不远了。这点从近期的融资就可以看出端倪。12月2日,1inch宣布以SAFT形式(未来代币简单协议,承诺在将来的某个日期交付代币)完成1200万美金的A轮融资。

3.Balancer

Balancer 与 Uniswap 机制类似,同样采用自动做市商协议,但有三点不同:

  • 最高支持8种资产的做市组合。Uniswap仅支持两种代币之间的组合,例如ETH与USDT各占50%,但Balancer可以自定义资产比例和类别,用户最多可以构造8种资产的组合,因此也被称为N维自动化做市商。
  • 自定义资产比例。Uniswap中两种资产的比例固定为50%:50%,但在Balancer用户可以自行设置。例如之前火爆一时的某个矿池由2%的YFII与98%的DAI构成。
  • 自定义交易费率。用户在Uniswap做市可自行设置交易费率,这对于稳定币交易的用户尤为重要,如果在Uniswap交易稳定币,将被收取0.3%的交易手续费,而在Balancer可能只花费0.16%的手续费。

Balancer的代币是BAL,据币小宝区块链大数据显示,BAL目前流通市值为8600万美元。

Uniswap
https://www.bixiaobao.com/cn/coinlist/Balancer

4.SushiSwap

SushiSwap是Uniswap的竞争对手,无论从功能上还是界面上均采用与Uniswap类似的设计,但SushiSwap 目前有挖矿激励,用户可以在不同的池子质押LP代币获取收入,年化收益40%~150%之间。

Uniswap此外,SushiSwap目前也在测试挂单模式,产品更新速度非常快。

SushiSwap的发展可谓一波三折,目前社区趋于稳定,SUSHI代币价格也由之前最低0.5美元附近反弹至目前的2.4美元左右高点。

5.路印协议

与以上几个项目不同,路印协议的团队来自中国,也是目前国内比较领先的Defi项目。此外路印协议还有几个特点:

  • 采用layer2扩容方案。以上几个项目采用的均是基于以太坊网络(layer2)搭建的,但路印协议采用的是layer2方案。layer2的优势是拥有更高的交易速度和更低的成本,其解决方案也多次受到以太坊创始人V神的认可。
  • 首个上线coinbase的国内项目,另一个是YFII。
  • 采用的是挂单模式,这种模式类似于中心化交易所的交易方式,因此用户更容易上手。近期随着流动性挖矿的兴起,也推出了基于AMM模式机制的交易所。

总之,以上5家交易所侧重点各有不同,1inch主打低滑点交易,路印则发力layer2,主打类似于传统交易所的挂单模式,SushiSwap以挖矿吸引用户,未来,去中心化交易所何去何从,我们拭目以待。

Uniswap和Sushiswap的比较

交易所历来是区块链领域的兵家必争之地,而去中心化交易所(DEX)则是本次DeFi热潮的主要赛道之一。从势如破竹的去中心化交易所Uniswap,到近几天名声大噪的赛场新星Sushiswap,一场“swap party”变得越发热闹。今天我们来讲讲这两个DEX,看看它们的异同。

本文主要内容包括以下6点:

l Uniswap和Sushiswap概况;

l 这两家DEX的自动做市商(AMM)原理;

l Uniswap的激励机制;

l Sushiswap的激励机制;

l Sushiswap的早期引流方法;

l 这二者的风险。

Uniswap和Sushiswap概况

Uniswap是一家去中心化交易所(DEX),用来进行代币兑换。

Uniswap是一个运行在以太坊区块链上的流动性协议,也就是一组部署到以太坊网络的合约,所有的交易都在链上进行。它不仅跟传统的加密货币交易所不同,也跟普通的去中心化代币交易所不同。它和上述交易所最大的不同就在于,它是基于兑换池,而不是订单簿的去中心化交易协议。在这里没有限价的买单卖单,用户与兑换池按照实时的市价进行交易,见下图。所谓的兑换池,指的是一个资金池,用户把一定量的token充入资金池,就可以兑换出同等价格的另一种token。在兑换过程中,交易所收取0.3%的手续费。用户在Uniswap中交易的价格则由这个资金池中的代币比例和算法来决定。这个算法是自动做市商(AMM),后文会详细讲。

订单簿
兑换池

Uniswap在2019年就已经上线,现在它已经是头号DEX了。

Sushiswap也是一家去中心化交易所(DEX),用来进行代币兑换。目前Sushiswap尚未完全启动,在它完全启动后,它实现的功能与Uniswap相同。Sushi是日语寿司的意思,所以有人把这个项目叫寿司。

寿司店(sushiswap)菜单

Sushiswap协议是今年8月底才从Uniswap分叉而来,它基本延续Uniswap的核心设计,没有构建全新的模式,同样也是采用兑换池+自动做市商(AMM)的模式。另外,Sushiswap的代币池和前端页面设计与Uniswap也基本相同。

自动做市商原理

上文说过,Uniswap和Sushiswap都是采用基于兑换池的交易协议,依靠自动做市商模式来实现兑换,现在详细讲讲自动做市商(AMM)的原理。

Uniswap并不使用订单簿模式来决定代币的价格,相反,代币的价格(汇率)会在用户交易的过程中连续且自动地根据供需量和恒定乘积公式计算得出。恒定乘积公式就是:X*Y=K。其中X和Y分别代表交易池中两种代币的可用数量。配合恒定乘积公式,一个交易对(也即一个流动性兑换池)中的一种代币的价格,根据池中的供给量和交易者的需求量得出,价格会在根据该公式画出的一条曲线上变动。

X*Y=K,或者说Y=K/X,就是我们初中学过的反比例函数。当K不变时,X增大,Y必然减小,反之亦然。在DEX里,用户向兑换池中充入token X,X的数量增多了,Y的数量必然减小,而这减少的Y的数量就被用户取出,完成兑换。

举例:假设流动性兑换池中有X token1000个,Y token100个,也就是10个X换1个Y。一名用户向兑换池中充入10个X,根据恒定乘积公式计算Y≈99,Y末-Y初=-1,这减少的1个Y就由这个用户拿走,实现了10个X兑换1个Y。

AMM原理示例

S在实际的Uniswap兑换过程中,还存在滑点的现象。滑点是指用户最终实现兑换的汇率偏离了真实的汇率。比如在上面的例子中,如果用户充500个X,他只能换出33.3个Y,相当于15个X才能换一个Y,用户就要承受损失。当兑换金额相对于兑换池资金量过大,或者说对于一定的兑换金额,兑换池资金太少时,就会出现滑点。但当兑换池中的代币数量充足时,滑点的数额就会减少,而且资金越多,滑点越小。滑点的大小和常说的交易深度大小相反,滑点越小,交易深度越大,用户越能够按照稳定的价格完成交易。

同一时刻,ETH兑换LINK,兑换金额太大产生滑点

恒定乘积公式的K越大,也就是资金池里的资金越多时,代币交换滑点越小,流动性也就越好。在这里的流动性就是指当用户想完成某一笔兑换时,他就能够在滑点最小的情况下顺利地完成。AMM模式鼓励用户为兑换资金池提供流动性,方式就是用户向流动性资金池中存入等价值的2种代币,比如上面例子里,用户同时存入100个X和10个Y。如果用户存入的2种代币不等值,比如他存入了100个X和100个Y,(此时的市价还是10个X换1个Y)这会造成兑换池里Y的供给相对过剩,X和Y的相对价值就出现了不平衡。套利者灵机一动,向兑换池里存入383.3个X,兑换出51.7个Y,而按照市价他只能换38.33个Y,于是他净赚13.37个Y。兑换池在经过套利者的一番操作后,又恢复了10个X换1个Y的市价,详情见下表。

套利使系统重新归于平衡

依靠恒定乘积公式的AMM模式需要套利交易来让流动性池中的代币价格与市场价格保持一致。从本质上来说,这些协议依然需要通过外部交易系统来调控流动性兑换池中代币的价格。

AMM模式依靠用户为资金池提供流动性完成自动做市,它给用户的激励就是一定比例的兑换手续费。为流动性资金池提供流动性的用户称为流动性提供者(LP Liquidity Provider)。

Uniswap的经济激励机制

Uniswap给流动性提供者的奖励就是交易所的手续费。流动性提供者可以得到所在流动性池中代币交易的手续费作为奖励,手续费率为0.3%,流动性提供者之间依据存入资金的份额按比例分配。

根据上文截图中的数据计算,一天的成交额是40.85亿CNY,一天的手续费就有122万元,经过一段时间的积累,流动性提供者(LP)得到的手续费奖励金额就非常可观了。Uniswap会根据流动性提供者存入资金的数额发给他们一定数量的LP token,我们可以理解为存款奖状或者收据,它是LP获得交易所手续费奖励的凭证。

注意:LP token不是Uniswap的项目代币或者说平台币,对于每一种代币交易对有不同的LP token。

举个例子具体说明:假设这个交易对是ETH–DAI,目前兑换比例是1ETH–400DAI。我向资金池充了1ETH和400DAI,这个资金池发给我1个LP token,代表我有1份(ETH–DAI)的流动性贡献。这个资金池所产生的手续费进入一个pool,经过一段时间后,pool中共有积累的手续费A个ETH和B个DAI,当我把我的1个LP token交还给Uniswap时,我有权利从pool拿走它按比例对应的手续费。假设此时整个资金池共发出了X个LP token,我的流动性贡献占比就是1/X,我就可以获得A/X个ETH和B/X个DAI,然后再赎回我的1ETH和400DAI。

Uniswap通过AMM模式和为流动性提供者奖励手续费的模式,极大地调动了LP的积极性。由于任何人都可以提供流动性并且从中获利,人们有动力为Uniswap提供流动性;交易所获得充足的交易流动性,交易滑点就小,用户体验也好。交易所的运行完全基于市场的需求进行。人工的运维成本大幅降低。

在Uniswap中,交易产品的挂牌会是免费的。而且由于不需要再用交易订单的模式,而且流动性也不需要专门的做市商来提供,因此目前证券市场中的做市商的成本就可以取消。降低了上币成本和做市成本,Uniswap对DeFi和整个区块链行业的发展起到了一定的促进作用。

为Uniswap提供流动性的用户可以获得经济激励。不过,这种激励存在两个美中不足之处:

1)对早期参与流动性提供的用户不够公平。

Uniswap能够运转,全凭流动性提供者为它提供了大量的流动性。早期流动性提供者承担了更多的风险,但并没有因此获得更多的收益。

Uniswap依靠着早期的LP存入的资金逐步发展,随着它越来越受欢迎,有越来越多的像风投基金、交易所、矿池这样的大资金进入提供流动性。虽然交易手续费累计的很多,但是早期LP的份额被摊薄了,他们没有能够享受到协议成长带来的长期回报。这有点像早期的滴滴司机或者淘宝店主,正是他们让平台实现了发展,然而在平台发展之后他们并没有享受到更多的收益。

此外,流动性提供者只有在他们提供流动性时才赚取资金池的交易费。一旦他们撤回资金池中自己的资金,将不再获得相应的收入。

2)无常损失得不到补偿。

为Uniswap提供流动性可以交易手续费,但也存在无常损失。无偿损失是指流动性提供者按当时的市价存入2种代币,在他要取出这些代币时,它们的兑换价格发生了变化而导致的损失。如果这2种代币中某个代币大幅上涨或下跌都可能导致无常损失。注意,不管涨还是跌,都有可能导致损失。

还是以上面表格里的X和Y为例。当10个X换1个Y时,我存入100X和10Y。假设现在行情变化,也就是X和Y的兑换比例变化了:不管现在是10个X换2个Y(Y跌了),还是20个X换1个Y(Y涨了),我如果想赎回我的资金,都必须按照现在的兑换比例,取出价格相等的X和Y,不能破坏资金池中2种代币的比例平衡,不然套利者就又要出动了。这也就是说,我取出来的不是我存入的100X和10Y,而是按照新的市价的兑换比例,比如120X和8Y。而这相比我直接持有100X和10Y不动,是会产生损失的。

当然,它本质上也是资产的再平衡,从这个角度看,不算是无常损失。不过,在退出时,如果按照法币计价,可能会出现获得的费用收益不如直接持有代币所得的收益更高的现象。而且这个无常损失,是无偿的损失。

Sushiswap的经济激励机制

Sushiswap在Uniswap的激励机制基础上做出了一些改变,这是它们二者最大的区别。Sushiswap增加了代币经济激励,也就是将其交易费用的一部分分配给Sushiswap代币SUSHI的持有人。

Uniswap没有发行平台币,它每笔交易收0.3%的手续费,再通过LP token的形式把交易费按比例分配给LP(流动性提供者)。

Sushiswap发行了平台币SUSHI,它的交易手续费也是0.3%。它将这0.3%的手续费分成2个部分,其中0.25%提供给LP,方法和Uniswap一样;剩下的0.05%将用于回购SUSHI代币,即用这部分钱购买SUSHI代币持有者手里的SUSHI代币。这意味着,SUSHI的价值与Sushiswap平台交易量是挂钩的。在Sushiswap上,交易量越大,SUSHI捕获的价值就越高。SUSHI代币和COMP、LEND、YFI一样,也可以在二级市场交易。此外,为了保证研发和运营的持续,有10%SUSHI代币会用于开发和未来的迭代、审计等。

Sushiswap的经济激励机制在Uniswap的基础上做了改进,它保证了早期参与者的长期利益。

Sushiswap每个区块将释放100枚SUSHI代币,会均分给所有支持的代币池,LP们还是根据流动性贡献来按比例获得SUSHI。和Uniswap用LP token的形式来分配手续费不同,LP token只有在存入代币对时才发给用户,而SUSHI是每个区块都产生一次,根据用户现在的资金比例分配。这样即使未来有大资金进入Sushiswap,早期参与者的资金份额被摊薄,但是他们之前已经获得的SUSHI代币不会减少,这就相当于是挖到了“头矿”。更何况在最初的100,000个区块,SUSHI产量更高,每个区块释放1,000枚SUSHI。在Sushiswap交易额增长起来后,SUSHI代币的价格也水涨船高,早期参与者凭借着早期相对较高资金份额占比而积累下的SUSHI代币可以享受到Sushiswap长期发展带来的福利。此外,前文提及,Uniswap的LP在赎回了当初存入的代币对之后,就不能再获得交易所的手续费分成了,而Sushiswap的LP即使赎回了资金,也还能够凭借着持有的SUSHI代币获得币价上涨带来的利益。

Sushiswap的经济激励机制也并非尽善尽美。SUSHI代币有2个主要用途。第1点是用于投票。投票决定每个区块产生的100个SUSHI在各个代币对兑换池中分配的比例,也就是哪个池子分到的SUSHI奖励多一点;投票决定是不是要新开放某个新代币对兑换池。对于特定的LP来说,这2种投票的目的都是为了让自己获得更多的SUSHI奖励,消耗一部分SUSHI以获得更多的SUSHI。这样会不会造成分配权重大的资金池分配比例越来越大呢,还有待时间的检验。第2点就是上文说的用于兑换那0.05%的手续费。在交易所蒸蒸日上的阶段这当然是好的了,不过如果交易额下降呢。无限通货膨胀的SUSHI和正在下降的手续费分成相互作用,会导致新产生的SUSHI越来越不值钱,对币价下降的预期则会让老持币人竞相抛售。如果他们再从流动性资金池里撤资,交易所流动性不足,引起交易滑点过大,用户体验变差,交易额就会进一步下降。这样的恶性循环会迅速让它承受巨大损失。这样的情形不一定会出现,但是会有这样的风险。虽然在Uniswap中同样存在交易额下降引发流动性下降的恶性循环,不过它没有平台币,也就没有币价下降的第三重刺激。

Sushiswap中同样存在无常损失。

Sushiswap的大招

仅靠改进的经济激励模型,能不能让Sushiswap超越老大哥,坐上DEX头把交椅呢,我们不得而知。不过项目方还想了别的办法,真正的大招还在后头呢。

第一步。Sushiswap为Uniswap的流动性提供者提供了赚取SUSHI代币的机会。Uniswap的流动性提供者可以将其LP token质押在Sushiswap,然后在区块高度10750000开始赚取SUSHI代币。目前只收LP token,还不能直接存入代币对。这好比是你在一家大银行Uniswap存了钱,它发给你一个收据,凭此取钱。新银行Sushiswap说,你的收据质押在我这里,1星期以后我给你这张收据发利息,你的钱还在原来的银行,收据你想拿走随时拿走。这样的好事谁不干,于是大家纷纷把Uniswap的LP token质押在Sushiswap。

只要LP token

第二步。在协议启动大约两周(最初100,000个区块)后,Sushiswap会启动针对Uniswap的流动性池迁移计划。在迁移过程中,首先是这一批用户在Uniswap上进行代币对的赎回,然后将这些代币池迁移,也就是把从Uniswap里取出来的钱存到Sushiswap里。就这样,Sushiswap将获得大量的流动性,它的流动性是从Uniswap那里直接拿来的。

近日Uniswap锁仓量(就是资金池的存款量)暴涨,原因就是Sushiswap只收Uniswap的LP token,用户必须先到Uniswap去存钱,换出LP token,才能把它质押到Sushiswap里。

复制粘贴你的运行原理,剪切粘贴你的用户。

SIGOI!(日语:好厉害)

风险

最后我们谈一谈这两家DEX的风险。

l 技术风险

Uniswap在2020年3月19日在以太坊主网上推出了一个新版本,还配合着公开了核心合约的1.0.1版;在发行之前,该版本已经在Rinkeby测试网上测试过一段时间了。这个新版本在以太坊主网上已经使用超过了两个月时间,而且迄今为止,没有出现任何损坏智能合约完整性的问题。

Uniswap V2 在上线主网之前经过了充分的测试和审核。对源代码的尽职审核“很有可能”保证了未来不会发现任何重大的问题,不过Uniswap还是发布了一个Bug悬赏,任何人发现了重大漏洞都可以获得奖金。

从Sushiswap宣布的信息看,它邀请Trail of Bits、PeckShield、OpenZeppelin、Consensys、Certik、Quantstamp中的其中一家对其合约进行审计。但目前为止还没有完成正式审计。这里是有潜在风险的。即便完成了审计,任何流动性挖矿都存在潜在的智能合约漏洞风险。

编写出没有任何错误的代码是非常困难的,而开发人员也不可能设想到所有的潜在风险,尤其是在DeFi发展如此火爆的今天。Uniswap和Sushiswap都存在一定程度的技术风险。审计、测试以及购买智能合约保险都可以降低技术风险。

l 经济模型风险

许多区块链项目,特别是在DeFi领域,都需要依靠经济激励来激励网络的参与者。有时候经济模型看起来无懈可击,却包含着潜在的风险。

对于这两家DEX的LP来说,首先要面对的就是上文所说无常损失风险。而且是为价格波动越大的币种提供流动性,出现无常损失的风险越高,这导致很多用户发现,为DEX提供流动性(也就是流动性挖矿)带来的收益还不如无常损失更多。

SUSHI是每个区块产生100个,它与比特币、以太币等不一样。比特币只有2100万枚,而SUSHI是无限通货膨胀的,未来Sushiswap的交易额增长能够跑得过无限通胀呢,现在还没有一个明确的结论。

交易额下降会不会引发流动性枯竭,造成恶性循环,这是它们都面临的风险。

l 外部风险

外部风险指的不是Uniswap和Sushiswap本身存在的风险,而是在它们上线的项目中存在的风险。例如:项目的虚假宣传、项目方大量抛售代币导致币价崩盘等等。

只需要建立两个资金池,就可以无上币费、无审查、无成本地“三无上币”,大大降低了项目方发币割韭菜的难度和成本,这简直比2017年还疯狂。

结语:

以前说币圈一天,人间一年,现在是DeFi圈一天,币圈一年。这两家swap不是“swap party”的谢幕,还会有更多DEX和其他项目粉墨登场。希望各项目能够互相促进,共同为数字金融和区块链行业的发展助力。

本文部分观点参考以下文章:

有关Uniswap V2的一切:新功能与工作原理。www.8btc.com/article/641872

火币观察:SUSHI飙涨行情耀眼,SushiSwap是否存在风险?www.jinse.com/news/blockchain/804917.html

从Uniswap看未来的数字资产交易所。www.8btc.com/article/636431

全维度深入解析:Uniswap的正面与背面。www.8btc.com/media/636300

SushiSwap锁仓超10亿美元,赚钱效应成DeFi繁荣的最大推手。www.jinse.com/news/blockchain/805211.html

Sushiswap:Uniswap的进化?http://blog.csdn.net/lanhubiji/article/details/108289403

作者:蒋梦初

币安与Coinbase的相爱相杀

4 月 14 日 13:43,在 Coinbase 即将正式登陆纳斯达克的最后关头,“戏剧性”的一幕发生了。

Coinbase 于上市文件(S-1)中点名指出的头号竞争对手、已明确表态不会上市的币安官方宣布将上线 Coinbase 股票代币 COIN。 

币安「抢上」Coinbase

恍惚之间,人们突然意识到,在打通传统资本与加密货币的壁垒这件事上,Coinbase 及币安这两大顶级交易所似乎已走上了不同的道路:前者选择了亲身登陆传统资本市场,为传统证券市场的投资者们提供投资加密领域优质企业的便捷渠道,后者则是选择了一种更加 crypto 的方式,通过股权代币的形式为加密投资者打开了投资传统资本市场优质资产的窗口。

不过,如果细看 Coinbase 及币安的战略布局,不难发现这两大引领了整个交易所赛道发展数年之久的顶级玩家其实很早之前就已走在了岔路之上,且正各自引领着一批“后继者们”朝着截然不同的方向迈进。 

01 下一站,传统资本市场 or 新兴加密世界?

Coinbase 及币安站上岔路口的时间节点大致可以向前推溯至去年夏秋之际。

2020 年 7 月,路透社从数位知情人士处获悉,Coinbase 已悄然启动上市准备工作,数月之后,Coinbase 宣布已向美国证券交易委员会(SEC)提交了 S-1 注册申请,正式确认了外界关于其上市筹备的传闻。

同年 9 月,在以太坊 gas 居高不下,体验愈发糟糕之际,币安宣布兼容 EVM 的币安智能链(BSC)主网正式上线。仅仅半年过去,BSC 之上已构建起了繁荣的生态规模,DeBank 数据显示,目前 BSC 链上的 DeFi 总锁仓量(TVL)数据为 237.5 亿美元,已达以太坊链上 TVL 的三分之一。

币安「抢上」Coinbase

从经营特色及业务重心上看,Coinbase 及币安长期以来一直存在着较大的差异。

Coinbase 自诞生以来一直秉承着传统严谨的打法,仅在获取了监管许可的地方开展业务,不发平台币,不做衍生品,不上线甚至会主动下架在监管层面存在争议的代币(比如 XRP),这些近乎极致的自我约束为其选择登陆传统资本市场打下了良好的基础,最终也为其赢得了赛道内首张登陆纳斯达克的船票。

Coinbase 的成功也激励了无数后来者。年初, Gemini 创始人 Winklevoss 兄弟在接受采访时就曾回答称:“我们正在观察整个市场,我们内部也在讨论在这个时间点将 Gemini 上市是否有意义。”本月上旬,Kraken 方面也透露称正在考虑于明年的某个时候上市,可能采取类似于 Coinbase 的直接上市方式。

与主打美国市场的 Coinbase 不同,币安对于传统市场和新世界都有打算。

由于币安的全球业务范围更广,涉及司法辖区更多,因此不得不采取一种非标准化、更灵活的的合规策略。具体来说,币安会在监管更加严格、明晰的地区与当地合规主体合作,由这些合作伙伴推出完全符合当地监管要求的平台来进行独立运营,比如与 Coinbase 同样专攻美国市场的币安美国(Binance.US)现在就已拿下了 37 个州的运营牌照,未来待也不排除上市可能;而在监管相对积极的地区,币安的选择是通过主站(Binance.com)快速抢占市场,结合用户需求持续不断地推出合约、期权、Staking、DeFi 挖矿等全新服务。

而 BSC,则是币安在过去以及未来很长一段时间发展的重中之重。作为一家顶级中心化交易所的创始人,赵长鹏本人曾多次强调去中心化交易所(DEX)才是未来的大势所趋,这或许也是币安没有像 Coinbase 一样选择拥抱传统资本市场,而是朝着加密货币世界更深处走去的潜在原因。

币安「抢上」Coinbase

当前,BSC 生态内已涌现出了海量项目,各类基础设施、DeFi 及 NFT 组件等等均已趋向完善,除其自身生态持续活跃,用户及锁仓数据大有直追以太坊之势外,BSC 也引领了一阵交易所公链的集体爆发潮。

BSC 的成功也反哺了 BNB,作为链上唯一的 gas 通证,其诞生及爆发为 BNB 赋予了全新的使用场景及价值内涵,这也是 BNB 在过去几个月内持续攀升的关键原因之一。

02 核心业务对比,BNB 还能继续飞吗?

自从 Coinbase 确认即将上市以来,关于该交易所的估值猜测就从未停歇。纳斯达克今早给出的参考价格(非开盘价)设定为单股 250 美元,以该价格计算,完全稀释后的 Coinbase 估值将达到约 653 亿美元。如果按照投行 Moffett Nathanson 给出的单股 600 美元目标价计算,Coinbase 完全稀释后的估值更是将高达 1567 亿美元。

在外界关于 Coinbase 的估值猜测水涨船高之际,BNB 的价格及流通市值也在持续攀升,这不禁让人想把这两家顶级交易所拉着做一场系统性的大对比,看看双方的核心业务数据究竟孰优孰劣?营收水平各自如何?估值(代币流通市值)是否合理?谁被高估或是低估了?

在对比之前,首先需要就数据获取申明两点原则:

  • 所有拟对比数据之中,仅有少部分数据有明确的官方信息源可查,因此在引用非官方数据时,我们将优先选取信誉度较高的第三方数据源(因 CoinMarketCap 已被币安收购,所以下文的第三方数据源优先选取 CoinGecko),另外一些第三方数据源亦无法提供的信息,我们将通过特定规则推算估测,具体推算方式会加以说明。
  • 由于部分数据来自于推算,故相较真实情况可能会有一定偏差,下文对比结果仅代表基于文内推算规则所呈现的理论结果。

对比维度一:交易量数据

由于 Coinbase 并不提供衍生品交易服务,所次这里的交易量对比仅限于现货数据。

上周二,Coinbase 正式发布了该交易所 2021 年第一季度的业绩预测报告,报告内提及,预计 Coinbase 第一季度总交易量为 3350 亿美元。我们尝试拿这一数据去验证 CoinGecko 数据的准确程度,由下图可见,过去 24 小时 Coinbase 的交易量约为 42 亿美元,可推算该交易所在一个季度的时长范围内交易量数据基本也是会在三千余亿美元这一水平线。

币安「抢上」Coinbase

再看币安,过去 24 小时,仅币安主站(Binance.com)的交易量就已达到了 506 亿美元,是 Coinbase 交易数据的十倍有余。

综上,在现货交易量方面,币安相较于 Coinbase 有着压倒性的优势。这一数据并不令人意外。目前,币安主站共支持 299 个币种、1020 个交易对,Coinbase 则仅支持 54 个币种、162 个交易对,更多的币种及交易对意味着更多的投资选择,上图之中「Visits」一栏清楚地展示了,在同一时期内币安的访客数据(1.38 亿人次)远高于 Coinbase(1788 万人次)。

币安「抢上」Coinbase

注:Alexa 给出的加密货币网站人气 Top 50,币安是唯一一家战胜了 CoinMarketCap 及 CoinGecko 的交易所网站,可看出其网站流量优势。

对比维度二:营收数据

理论上来讲,交易所营收的最主要来源是用户的交易手续费,考虑到币安在现货交易量上的压倒性优势,且在 Coinbase 尚未触及的衍生品交易领域也居于市场头名,其营收水平理应远高于 Coinbase,那么具体情况究竟如何呢?

还是先丢出 Coinbase 自己披露过的数据。在提交给 SEC 的 S-1 表格中,Coinbase 透露该交易所在 2020 年的总收入为 13 亿美元,净利润为 3.2 亿美元,调整后税息折旧及摊销前利润(EBITDA)大约为 5.3 亿美元。

币安「抢上」Coinbase

而在上周发布的 2021 年第一季度业绩预测报告中,Coinbase 预计其第一季度季度总收入为 18 亿美元,净利润约为 7.3 – 8 亿美元,EBITDA 大约为 11 亿美元。

再看币安,去年 12 月,赵长鹏在接受彭博社采访时曾提及,2020 年币安的净利润约为 8 – 10 亿美元,对比同时期 Coinbase 3.2 亿美元的净利润状况,可以看出币安的确有着更强的营收能力。

至于 2021 年第一季度的营收状况,由于币安作为私企并没有经营状况披露义务,因此在官方不主动透露的情况下很难获知具体数额,但我们可通过 BNB 的历史销毁情况大致捕捉到一些蛛丝马迹。

截至发文,币安仍未公布 2021 年第一季度的 BNB 销毁情况,所以我们选取过去四个季度的平均销毁数量来进行推算。查阅币安官方公告可知,过去四个季度的 BNB 销毁数量分别为 3373988 BNB、3477388 BNB、2253888 BNB、3619888 BNB,均值为 3181288 BNB。

至于 BNB 价格,如果取第一季度最后一天(3 月 31 日)的市场报价 270 USDT,反向推算得出 BNB 第一季度的销毁金额为 8.59 亿美元;考虑到第一季度 BNB 几乎呈现着单边上涨行情,更合理的方式或许是取季度最高价及最低价的中位数 180 USDT 计算,这样反向推算得出的 BNB 第一季度的销毁金额为 5.72 亿美元。

接着,我们再根据推算出的 BNB 销毁金额来反推其第一季度营收状况。这里需要特别澄清一件事,在旧版 BNB 白皮书,币安曾明确提及将拿出单季度利润的 20% 来回购 BNB 进行销毁,但在新版白皮书中这一描述已被删除。但从历史经验来看,过去几个季度的 BNB 销毁数量与币安平台的交易量仍呈正相关,因此这一步的推算仍将根据旧版白皮书的 20% 规则进行,如果币安已有了新的未公开销毁标准,这一步的计算误差理论上的确会进一步放大。

简单计算后的结果是,如果 BNB 取价 270 USDT,2021 年第一季度币安的预期利润为 42.95 亿美元,如果 BNB 取价 180 USDT,2021 年第一季度币安的预期利润为 28.6 亿美元。

综上,无论取哪个数字,推算得出的币安 2021 年第一季度预期利润较 2020 年全年利润均高出数倍之多,但考虑第一季度恰逢史无前例的超级牛市,Coinbase 单季度净利润也数倍于 2020 年全年利润,推算结果似乎也在情理之中。

对比维度三:估值(流通市值)/利润数据

相较于单纯的交易量及营收数据,估值(流通市值)/利润的具体比例可以更清晰地看出市场对于交易平台股价(币价)的情绪状况,也是判断双方是否被高估或低估的一大重要参考标准。 

还是先行丢出 Coinbase 的数据,如果依照纳斯达克给出的参考价格 250 美元,完全稀释后的 Coinbase 估值将达到约 653 亿美元,对应第一季度 7.3 – 8 亿美元的净利润(注意是单季度极润),估值/利润比例约为 81.6 – 89.5 之间。如果按照投行 Moffett Nathanson 给出的单股 600 美元目标价计算,Coinbase 完全稀释后的估值将高达 1567 亿美元,对应第一季度 7.3 – 8 亿美元的净利润(注意是单季度极润),估值/利润比例约为 195.8 – 214.6 之间。

币安「抢上」Coinbase

再看币安,随着 BNB 近期的一轮暴力拉升,BNB 流通市值现已达到 907 亿美元。参考上一环节,如果取 42.95 亿美元的第一季度预期利润,币安的流通市值/利润约为 21.1,如果取 28.6 亿美元的第一季度预期利润,币安的流通市值/利润约为 31.7。 

综上,即便在 Coinbase 的单股报价上取了相对保守的纳斯达克参考价格(250 美元),其估值/利润(81.6 – 89.5)比例仍远高于在单季预期利润上取了相对保守数据的币安流通市值/利润比例(31.7)。 

考虑到 Coinbase 作为首家直接登陆传统资本市场的加密货币交易所,也将在短时间内成为 old money 通过二级证券交易平台持有币圈头部交易所合法权益的唯一选择,其股价存在一定的溢价并不令人意外。

不过,整体对比下来不难看出,币安在交易量、营收状况、估值(流通)/利润等方向较 Coinbase 仍有着一定的优势,因此,即便不谈 BNB 是否被低估,其近期的强势表现多少也有些价值回归的意思。

03 不上市的币安,终点在哪里?

自 2018 年起,赵长鹏就曾多次在公开场合或私下采访中明确表态,币安暂时没有 IPO 计划。

诚然,Coinbase 的成功上市是该交易所自身发展历程上的一大阶段性胜利,也将为 Kraken、Gemini 等后来者们打通一条荆棘之路,更是会成为整个加密货币世界迈向主流的一大里程碑事件。但我们更好奇的是,不上市的币安,其终点究竟在哪里?

今年年初,赵长鹏在回答媒体提问时曾就不上市的原因给出了更进一步的解释。赵长鹏表示:“币安更希望走的是一条更适合加密世界的道路,扩大其实用型通证 BNB 的效用。”

不难看出,赵长鹏指出的「更适合加密世界的道路」显然包括其在 BSC 上的探索,也应该包括最近刚刚启动,即将“抢上”Coinbase 的股权代币交易业务。这在一定程度上也贴合了币安对于其自身的定位——不仅仅是交易所,而是要做加密货币世界的开放性服务平台。事实上,长期以来币安一直在持续扩充着交易之外的业务版图,公链、投资基金、矿池、钱包、数据分析、支付……币安的脚印正遍及加密货币世界的每一个角落,也难怪业内会戏谑一声“币安宇宙”。

By Azuma-星球日报

为什么要销毁代币

代币销毁就是将代币从流通中永久性移除,并减少总供应量的过程。为了解释这一过程是如何实现及怎样运作,接来下我们以Binance Coin(BNB)为例。

Binance通过名为“销毁函数”的智能合约功能来执行定期的Coin Burns事件。BNB销毁事件计划为每季度发生一次,直到最终销毁的BNB数量达到1亿,而这一数量相当于BNB总发行量(2亿BNB)的50%。而每一季度BNB的销毁量也将根据3个月内交易所中进行的交易量来执行。因此,在每个季度后,Binance将会根据总体交易量来销毁BNB。

如何销毁代币?

最常见的方法是将代币打入黑洞地址。黑洞地址是指丢了私钥,或是无法确定其私钥的地址,这些地址就像黑洞一样,只进不出,任何 Token 打到黑洞地址里就几乎不可能再转出来进入市场流通了。 基本上来说,代币销毁事件将会按照如下顺序来进行:代币持有者将调用销毁函数,并表示他想要销毁一定数量的代币。之后智能合约将验证是否他的钱包中是否持有BNB以及他所陈述的BNB数量是否准确。钱包中的代币数量为正数才有效。

如果此人并没有拥有足够的代币,或者制定的销毁量无效(如0或-5等),则该销毁函数将不会执行。如果代币持有者拥有足够的代币,则将会从钱包中扣除该数量。 之后代币的总供应量将会更新,而之前指定数量的代币将被销毁。如果您执行了销毁函数来销毁您的代币,则这些代币将会永久消失。已被销毁的代币将无法恢复。

为什么要销毁加密货币?

除了代币,其他的加密货币一样会销毁。比如销毁比特币,听上去可能是觉得很糟糕。但事实上,损坏或销毁加密货币的事件发生得十分频繁,而且也并没有听上去那么疯狂。

销毁加密货币,可以使剩余加密货币的价值升高。这是因为大多数加密货币的数量都是有限的。例如,比特币的总发行量是2100万个,现在处于流通状态的比特币有167万个,假如现在有100万的比特币被销毁了,而市场对比特币的需求仍保持不变,在这种情况下,比特币供应量的降低就会使其价格飙升。

这里面就涉及到一个问题,销毁加密货币意味着你要损失自己的钱财。如果我有1000枚比特币,我把它们全都销毁了,比特币的价格可能会提升 了,但这对我来说毫无意义,因为我手里已经没有比特币了。但是,为什么还会有人要销毁比特币呢?

主要原因有以下几个:

新的分红方式:平台通过发行自己的代币,来为公司的发展筹集资金。这就意味着如果你买了平台的代币,你就可以成为这家公司的股东,进而从公司的盈利中分得一杯羹。平台会不断从市场上回购代币,并将它们销毁;通过这种方式使得市面上的代币数量减少,进而提升其价格。而该公司的股东虽然没有得到直接的利润,但却可以使他们手中代币升值的方式对其进行了分红。

赋予新代币以价值:销毁加密货币的另一个重要原因就是,这么做可以赋予一种新发行的代币以价值。销毁加密货币是一种投资于全新加密货币的方法:为了获得一种新的货币,你必须“烧掉”(摧毁)另一种货币,比如比特币。从理论上讲,这将使每一种新的加密货币价值相当于被摧毁的币的价值,但实际上你不能真的摧毁加密货币,你只是把它送到一个会减少它的总供应量的地方,后文会对此进行详细描述。

清除未售出的ICO代币:大部分ICO在发行过程中会为要售卖的代币设定一个数量。而当ICO发行结束,代币却没有售光时,那些没有卖出去的代币就会留存在公司的钱包里。这时代币的价格已经由于ICO的发行而上涨了,也就是说发行公司没有购买这些代币,却白白获得了代币所拥有的价值。他们完全可以把钱包里剩下的代币在市场上卖掉,让自己小赚一笔。一些发行ICO的公司因此制定了一项销毁未售出ICO代币的政策。其中一个例子就是Neblio。他们遵守规定将ICO发行期间未售出的代币全部销毁,并通过这种方式,证明了他们只用ICO中筹集到的钱来开发自己的区块链项目。因此,他们凭借ICO发行所获得的收益完全取决于人们对他们团队代币的需求。这是保证公平的一种方式。

提醒:当一个公司声称他们要把加密货币销毁的时候,你一定要留心一下他们有没有采用“燃烧证明”机制,并对销毁过程进行追踪。

币安的销毁规则

币安于2019年10月17号公布了BNB的第9次销毁记录,据官方公告称,币安“完成上个季度2,061,888 BNB的销毁“,等值36,700,000美元。

然而,本次销毁却因为币安CMO的何一和OKEx的CEO Jay在微博上的“互撕”,变得格外引人关注。两位高管在微博上唇枪舌战,你来我往,互不相让,完全不念旧情。

 每逢销毁必撕逼? 

在火币公布第三季度HT的回购销毁量2天后,币安第三季度对BNB的回购销售数据也出炉。然而本次BNB的回购却又一次被质疑,擅自更改回购销毁规则、回购不透明、团队涉嫌套现等情况又一次把币安推上了舆论的风口浪尖。10月18日,圈内媒体区块律动发微博报道BNB第三季度的销毁数据,却引来OKEX的CEO Jay的质疑。

每逢销毁必撕逼? BNB到底错在哪

2019年7月,币安公布第二季度BNB销毁数量和规则时,就曾被火币指责过,何一和火币CEO七爷在某媒体群里对BNB的销毁进行辩论。而本次的核心矛盾和上次的核心问题几乎如出一辙。其中大家讨论和质疑最多的就是币安擅自修改销毁规则。此前币安的7次销毁BNB,均是来自当季度币安利润的20%,由于币安的主要利润就是BNB,所以是直接从币安的利润中直接销毁掉。而从今年第二季度时,币安就改变了销毁规则,不销毁利润的20%,而是直接从团队持有的BNB进行销毁。这样说有点拗口,我们来举个例子:假设市场上原有流通的BNB一共有1000个,币安一个季度赚走了其中的100个BNB,等币安承诺的日子到了,币安就会把这100个BNB中的20%,也就是20个BNB直接销毁掉,这样市场上的BNB就只有980个了,以此类推,每季度的销毁可以保证在市面上流通的BNB是逐渐减少的。而币安从第二季度就悄悄地改变了一下规则,这100个BNB的利润,不再进行销毁了,而是直接从币安手里原有的BNB进行销毁掉。也就是说,市面上流通的BNB可能还是1000个。

这不是币安的第一次改变规则,4 月 18 日,据 the block 报道,币安在新版白皮书中,删除了 「回购」一词,原版本中关于 「每季度公司将用 20% 的利润回购并销毁 BNB 」 的条款。改成了「每季度公司将基于币安交易利润销毁 BNB」。

如下图所示,左边的版本是 2017 年首次发布时的原始描述 (用红色突出显示)。右边则是新版本的变动。

每逢销毁必撕逼? BNB到底错在哪

币安创始人 CZ 对此的回应是:因为一些地区倾向于将盈利与证券联系起来。

另外一点值得疑问,而且币安也没有进行公开的回应,就是币安第三季度的销毁金额甚至要比第二季度和第一季度相加还要多。各位也清楚,第三季度开始后,整个数字货币市场进入熊市,币价下跌,交易量,交易活跃度也都相应的往下走。币安在第二季度的交易量为1596.2亿美元,虽然第三季度后半段加入了合约贡献的交易量,但依然下滑至1139.42亿美元,交易量缩水28.62%。交易量缩水,而且币安还下调了交易费费率,按说第三季度的利润应该远不如第二季度,而币安的销毁规则是本季度利润的20%,这个比例不变的话。币安本次的销毁金额为何远超第二季度呢?多出来的利润是哪里来的?

 币安是个好的项目方,不是一个好的交易所? 

回顾币安的发家史,“创新”是币安的一个重要标签。在币安以前,交易所不知道自己也能够发币——平台币。后来平台币的模式,基本被所有交易所使用。首创IEO模式,又带动了2019年的小牛市,也引领了一阵IEO风潮。BNB的价格也是从最开始的0.15美金,最高涨到接近40美金,即便是现在也有18美金,近120倍的涨幅。这几乎跑赢了从2017年以来市面上所有的加密货币。币安是不是一个好的项目方?是。投资人赚到,团队的员工也赚到了,在资本的世界里,这就是最优质的创业者。但是币安是不是一个好的交易所呢?表面上看,币安从2017年开始起家,用户和交易量一度登顶,成为全球最火热的交易所之一,甚至首先主网上线的公链和去中心化交易所,都一直走在了几大交易平台的前列。另外在全球化方面,币安也是做得比较好的,币安在多国拿到了合规牌照。同时在非主流资产的识别与挖掘上,币安也有很大的优势。但是,交易所最重要的也是赖以生存的安全问题,币安却栽了跟头。2019年丢的7000个BTC还历历在目。回顾交易所的发展史,有多少交易所死在了安全问题上。还有就是技术和使用体验,这点我们在上一篇《币安的困境》中有说,在此不再过多提及了。

 三大平台孰优孰劣?

BNB和HT的定期回购销毁,保证平台币是以通缩模型存在于市场,更像是通过市场交易提前去兑现平台的价值,特点是稳定。OKB的每周分红,更像传统证券市场的股票分红,持有者相当于是OKEx的股东,根据用户OKB持有量占比,将平台收益分发给持有者。无论是平台币被赋予的实用功能,还是其在价格上的升值预期,平台币之争归根到底是交易所之间对流量的竞争——只有交易所大规模盈利,才有利润注入平台币,围绕平台币的生态才得以繁荣。何种回购或者奖励规则,任何一种平台币的真实价值都取决于其应用价值。

By 鸵鸟区块链

Complete guide to Zcash

What Is Zcash?

Zcash is in the same category as other so-called “privacy coins” such as Monero, PivX, and Verge. The creators of Zcash want to use the underlying technology of Bitcoin and improve it by giving their users the ability to make their transactions untraceable and thus maintain their privacy. The privacy coin market is highly competitive and Zcash sets itself apart with its focus on science-backed technology and a team that is dedicated to decentralization and privacy.

Who Is Behind Zcash?

As the origins of Zcash lie in academia it’s not particularly surprising that the team behind the cryptocurrency contains a number of experienced computer scientists and cryptographers. This highly experienced team used cryptography to design a way to “shield” ZEC transactions and thus protect user privacy. Zcash gives users the ability to engage in two types of transactions. The first is a transparent transaction, which works essentially the same way as a Bitcoin transaction. Users also have the option to store and send their currency from a shielded address. This allows users to hide the metadata behind their transactions and thus maintain control over their privacy. zcash shielded wallets. A user can send money to a shielded wallet from a transparent wallet and this will only reveal the funds sent and not the funds received, this also works in reverse.

What Is Zcash’s zk-SNARK?

These shields are created using zk-SNARKs (the acronym stands for Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge). This is an interesting form of zero-knowledge cryptography. They allow one party (the prover) to prove to another (the verifier) possession of data (e.g. a secret key) without ever revealing the information or directly interacting with each other. Zcash is a privacy-focused cryptocurrency. See our cryptocurrency guides on Monero, Dash, and Verge — these are also known as privacy-oriented coins. This means that rather than directly validating the sender and receiving addresses, Zcash is able to validate a transaction without revealing any of the underlying information.

What Proof Is Required To Validate A Zcash Transaction?

In order to validate the transaction, the sender of a ‘shielded transaction’ constructs a proof to demonstrate that: The input values sum to the output values for each shielded transfer. The sender proves that they have the private spending keys of the input notes, giving them the authority to spend. The private spending keys of the input notes are cryptographically linked to a signature over the whole transaction, in such a way that the transaction cannot be modified by a party who did not know these private keys. A shielded transaction is also able to verify that a user possesses enough ZEC in order to process the transaction by using “commitments” and a corresponding nullifier.

What Are Zcash’s Unique Identifiers?

These commitments are all given a unique identifier called an “rho”, which is used to verify the payments. When a shielded transaction is spent the sender publishes a nullifier, which is the rho’s hash from an unused commitment. This provides a zero-knowledge way to demonstrate that they are authorized to make the transaction. The team behind ZEC insist that their blockchain is truly independent and decentralized, despite accusations that it is a corporate coin. They argue that because the protocol behind Zcash is open-source, they don’t have any control over the mining and distribution of ZEC, nor have access to any special shielded features.

Bitcoin vs Zcash: Similarities And Differences

How does Zcash compare to the leading cryptocurrency Bitcoin? What are the key differences? See below for our head-to-head comparison:

The Brief History Of Zcash

The precursor to Zcash started its life in form of Zerocoin. This John Hopkins University (Baltimore, USA) project was designed to address one of the primary drawbacks of Bitcoin, its lack of privacy. This eventually led to collaboration with cryptographers from MIT and Tel Aviv University in 2014, who improved the underlying protocol of Zerocoin. In 2015 the first mentions of collaboration between the Zerocoin team and Zooko surfaced and the coin was rebranded Zcash and released on October 28th, 2016 by the Zcash company.

How Was Zcash’s Launch Welcomed?

The launch of the coin was met with a lot of hype that resulted in the cryptocurrency being worth more than 6 Bitcoins (over $5,000) on the day of launch. This speculation quickly died down and since then ZEC has grown at an organic rate. The original launch was met with some controversy. Zcash was created using a “Parameter generation ceremony”. This involved 6 individuals who each created a fragment of the eventual “master passkey” necessary for Zcash to work. These keys were described as toxic waste.

How Do Zcash Master Keys Work?

A master key requires all 6 shards. This requires a lot of trust in the 6 individuals involved and the ceremony has been described as little more than security theatre. If the passkeys were somehow leaked or the individuals involved had colluded then it is theoretically possible for somebody to acquire the master passkey, which would give them the ability to create their own ZEC. It is impossible to prove the process worked. That being said, the security surrounding the event was particularly tight and there were no reported problems, bar a journalist’s phone acting very strangely.

How Could Zcash Be Compromised?

Despite the potential problems, it is also worth keeping in mind that only a single participant needs to have successfully destroyed all traces of their shard in order to ensure the ceremony was a success. So in order for someone to gain access to the master key, it would require all six participants to either be dishonest or compromised. By May 2017 the Zcash foundation had launched as “A non-profit organization, serving the Zcash community and promoting financial privacy”. This was a major milestone for Zcash which had always maintained that the currency was decentralized to serve the public’s interests, despite claims to the contrary.

How Is Zcash Made?

Zcash is mined in a similar way to most other cryptocurrencies. Governments or banks are centralized institutions that physically print money. Instead, Zcash and other cryptocurrencies take a decentralized approach. ZEC is created by its community through mining. The principles of the basic technology behind Zcash are the same as the technology behind Bitcoin. Both coins are mined through solving algorithms using computing power. The blockchain is secured through a consensus mechanism called Proof-of-Work (POW).

How Does Zcash Mining Work?

A miner uses their computer in order to solve complicated equations. Once the equation is solved, a new block is added to the chain and the miner is rewarded with ZEC. This reward system serves two purposes. The first is to encourage miners to devote computing power in order to complete transactions on the Zcash blockchain. Ethereum is now moving from using a proof-of-work (PoW) mechanism to implementing a proof-of-stake (PoS) protocol. The second is to regulate the creation of new ZEC, which is then distributed by the miners.

What Is The Zcash Founders’ Reward?

Zcash differs significantly from other cryptocurrencies because until 2020 the founders will receive a “founders reward” of 20% of all ZEC created. They have agreed to set aside 10% of this in order to create the Zcash foundation. This means that until 2020 miners receive 80% of all coins produced, the founders receive 10% and the Zcash foundation receives the other 10%. After 2020 the reward will halve and miners will receive 100% of all ZEC produced.

What Do Experts Say About Zcash?

As with most cryptocurrencies, the short-term price outlook for Zcash can be described in one way — volatile. The cryptocurrency market is still young and therefore still unstable. You should expect fairly big peaks and troughs in the short term. In the medium, to long-term, you may see Zcash experience a slow and steady increase in value as it has in the past. You will see ups and downs and while some do buy low and sell high, this is a more risky approach than holding for the long term.

Edward Snowden’s Opinion On Zcash And Privacy Coins

Zcash has proven to be fairly divisive amongst experts. Some, such as Edward Snowden, have argued that Zcash is important because it is one of the few privacy coins developed by actual cryptographers. Snowden has argued that this makes Zcash safer to use than Monero which he has described as “amateur crypto” pointing to traceability issues and design errors with Monero. “Zcash’s privacy tech makes it the most interesting Bitcoin alternative. Bitcoin is great, but if it’s not private, it’s not safe.” Edward Snowden

Manfred Karrer On Zcash

Regulation And Competition Others have also come out in support of Zcash and privacy coins in general.

Manfred Karrer, Developer and Founder of Bitsquare said: “I expect three things. One, regulations on cryptocurrency exchanges will come. Two, the war on cash, gold, and cryptocurrencies will accelerate. And three, privacy-protecting technologies like Monero and Zcash will elevate in importance.”Manfred Karrer, Founder of Bitsquare Despite these positives, there are a number of experts who believe that Zcash is too centralized to be considered a true privacy coin.

By Saul Bowden